On 02/17/17 14:15, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 02/17/2017 11:48 AM, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>> On 02/16/17 15:52, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>>> Forgive me if this has already been discussed or even fixed in later
>>> versions:  At least the Firebird 3.0 we build as part of LibreOffice
>>> defines global operator new replacement functions in
>>> src/common/classes/alloc.h (forwarding to MemoryPool) that do not in
>>> general fulfil the alignment requirements for such functions.
>>>
>>> Came across this when Firebird compiled with a recent trunk Clang (with
>>> -O, and DEBUG_GDS_ALLOC being undefined) on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
>>> causes SEGV from misaligned MOVAPS instructions.
>>>
>> Yes - allocated memory is aligned at 8 bytes boundary now.
>> I've tried to set alignment to 16 but looks like that's far not 5 lines
>> patch - sometimes we were choosing between 4/8 bytes alignment, but last
>> years only 8 bytes alignment was used.
>> May be finding specific compiler flag to avoid this instruction is
>> simpler choice for today?
> (The way I work around this for now in LibreOffice is by always defining
> DEBUG_GDS_ALLOC when building with Clang on Linux X86-64,
> <https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=8ea07101c1613d213fd7cea17f094a947b14cd00>
> "external/firebird: Work around operator new alignment violations".
> Since LibreOffice builds intended for widespread distribution are on
> Linux usually done with GCC not Clang, this shouldn't have a performance
> impact.)

Afraid that this work around is not too stable (not to say more). 
Certainly that macro does change details of memory allocation and may 
provide 16-bit alignment in some particular case but be sure it's not 
more than side effect and does not gurantee such alignment.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel

Reply via email to