> > it is the value that represent a direct CPU cost of a SQL statement.
> 
> You actually seem wanting CPU quotas. But they're not timeouts. A long-
> running statement may produce almost zero CPU load.

I have no problem with "ExecutionQuota" describing the functionality that I am 
referring to.

I do think, however, that the implementation of the quota is within reach, only 
requiring small/modest additions to the timeouts that Vlad has implemented.


Sean


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel

Reply via email to