Ok, so we do not follow the standard in our currently implementation, but we follow the standard in the DDL checking... this is a bit messy <g>
[]s Carlos http://www.firebirdnews.org FireBase - http://www.FireBase.com.br DY> 10.08.2017 21:57, Carlos H. Cantu wrote: >> DY> e.g. 1234567890.1234 is a valid (15, 4) but cannot be converted to (15, >> 6). >> >> Are you sure? I can store such value both in (15, 4) as well in (15, 6). DY> Formally, it cannot be stored inside (15, 6). But historically, FB DY> ignores the declared precision and always uses the maximum for the DY> underlying storage. This is buggy (from the SQL spec POV) and I expect DY> to have it fixed/improved one day. DY> Dmitry ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
