> In any case, we seem to have a stalemate here, so I guess there is not > much point in continuing to argue. I'll grudgingly implement support in > Jaybird by handling it identical to a normal TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE, > just in case someone configures a bind to EXTENDED TIME(STAMP) WITH TIME > ZONE.
It's funny (not) that provider writers are always having the shorter end of the rope. -- Mgr. Jiří Činčura https://www.tabsoverspaces.com/ Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
