On 15/08/2022 16:20, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: > I see no difference between proposed syntax and WITH except of > definition of functions instead of derived tables in CTE part. > What is wrong with expanding it into something like this: > > WITH
I prefer to not reuse a standard keyword for this. And the case with parameters makes WITH a complete different beast. Adriano Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
