On 24/08/2022 09:32, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote: > On 8/24/22 15:03, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: >> On 24/08/2022 08:59, Mark Rotteveel wrote: >>> On 24-08-2022 13:45, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: >>>> This is our Firebird 4.0.2 released files: >>>> >>> [..] >>>> It's difficult to understand, they do not mention OS and hardware >>>> architectures are inconsistent. >>>> >>>> I propose this name convention starting with Firebird 5: >>> [..] >>>> Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-linux-x64.tar.gz >>>> Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-linux-x64-debuginfo.tar.gz >>>> Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-linux-arm.tar.gz (armv7, other?) >>>> Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-linux-arm-debuginfo.tar.gz >>>> Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-linux-arm64.tar.gz >>>> Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-linux-arm64-debuginfo.tar.gz >>> [..] >>> >>> In general I'm OK with this, but currently our download page claims the >>> ARM32 and ARM64 build are for Android, and not generically Linux. >>> >>> So, are they actually generically Linux, or specifically for Android? >>> >> You might be correct. >> >> Alex can certainly explain better. > > Specifically for Android. I suppose this to be reflected in the name > cause it's quite possible that we will provide arm64 builds for generic > linux. >
What about our android arm for 32 bits? Should we name it arm, arm32, armv7, armv7l, other? Adriano Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
