""Carlos Guzmán Álvarez"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto nel messaggio news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I will add it to the 2.0 source tree, in the directory > > FirebirdSql > Data > Web > > along with the sql script, and in the same namespace ( > FirebirdSql.Data.Web ) > > I have done only some changes to follow the same coding style as in the > provider, are these changes ok for you ?? No problem, now is of public domain. > My only concern is if we should add this to the build proccess or not .. > huummm my first tought is that yes, while it will need references to: > > System.Configuration > System.Web > > Opinions are welcome ?? Except for CAS restrictions, if applies, I don't see any problem here (ok, maybe some design breaks). But if there are ideas about implementing other CustomProviders, then a separate assembly could be better. My only concern here is that it should ship with the main one, because (believe it or not) not all people will be able to build it themeselves. Ciao, Alessandro. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information _______________________________________________ Firebird-net-provider mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider
