On 10.7.2006 21:17 Carlos Guzmán Álvarez wrote: > Hello: >> >> With Firebird, using the .Net 2.0 provider, it takes much longer. >> Using FBCommand Insert statements, along with parameters for all >> inserted fields, it take over 5 minutes on my very fast computer. >> This could take possibly take up to 10 minutes on an average >> computer. While this would still save 56k users time compared to >> downloading an uncompressed file from the internet (saving about 40 >> minutes), it would not be acceptable for our broadband users. Also, >> reinstallation and upgrading would take an unacceptable amount of >> time. People usually do not like software upgrades to be slower. >> >> >> >> Are there any techniques for inserting large numbers of records with >> Firebird? I just cant see how Access 97, a 9 year old piece of >> software, can outperform Firebird by such leaps and bounds. >> > Are you using transactions ?? Are you using the embedded or standalone > firebird server ?? >>
And are you using prepared command, or creating you the new ones? >> >> > > -- Jiri Cincura http://blog.vyvojar.cz/jirka/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Firebird-net-provider mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider
