Hello,

Carlos Guzmán Álvarez said the following on 02.09.2006 20:55:

> I have no problem with that, while i think it's better to include only 
> the v2.0 of the provider
> in the mono 2.0 profile, but anyway i think that should be decided by 
> the mono people.

I've tried today to build provider 2.0.1-RC2 with the latest 1.1.18 mono
and it built without errors (just some warnings about unused variables).
And it said that 1.1.18 is last release before Mono 1.2.
Maybe it is time to include it in the mono's build? Now it is possible
to have 1.7.x provider for mono 1.0 profile, and 2.0.x provider for the
mono 2.0 profile...

-- 
Oleg


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Firebird-net-provider mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider

Reply via email to