My understanding is that Firebird 2.0 implements the full Unicode Collating
Algorithm when your character set is utf8 so my guess is its for that.
Itll be even nicer if it supported customizations per locale of the UCA,
but I guess theres always Firebird 3.0 :)
Dean.
_____
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Scott Price
Sent: Sunday, 17 December 2006 9:21 pm
To: For users and developers of the Firebird .NET providers
Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Unable to get Firebird 2.0 to work on
WinXP x64 (w/ AMD64)
Carlos Guzmán Álvarez wrote:
Hello:
What are those for anyway? Built-in SQL functions?
For the unicode support if i'm notworn ( not sure if they are used for
other encodings, hope, yes, and if i'm not sure if it's used for the
collations support as well )
Sorry Carlos, what type of Unicode support? Reading/storing/other?
Kind regards,
Scott :)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Firebird-net-provider mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider
