Steve Ramacher wrote:
> If you don't mind me adding my 2 cents in to the discussion, I think
> including the '@' symbol should be used just for readability sakes. When
> I am writing dynamic SQl the '@' symbol is a context clue for a
> parameter. Just seems like less room for confusion, but of course it is
> just a preference.
But we're talking about the internal representation. Of non-'@'-sign
params and '@'-sign params.
Maybe the best is to leave this as is ('cause it's good, clean,
deterministic, ...) and only work for some changes in DDEX, where this
"hack" VS uses. I've sent to Carlos some tests for this and then we'll
make some changes, I think ha add his 0.02$ too. ;)
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura
http://blog.vyvojar.cz/jirka/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Firebird-net-provider mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider
