>> I ask, because I think that would be to our (.Net and Java drivers) benefit 
>> to 
>> document these changes somehow. Do you think it is worth the effort? Is 
>> it feasible at all?
> 
> Sure. I think i should update the protocol documentation i have for the 
> actual protocol implementation of the provider.

Great!

>> Looks good. In Jaybird I was thinking about introducing new methods into 
>> GDS interface that would do similar things to your Prepare() and 
>> Execute() methods. However I would need to do some refactorings to be 
>> able to handle different protocol versions.
> 
> I was thinking on doing something similar too, not sure how i will be 
> doing that finally, while i like the idea posted on my previous post.

Your new idea is better, but it is only possible because your GDS 
exports quite high-level interface to the rest of the provider. It is 
not (yet?) possible in Jaybird, so I have to use either some other 
tricks or do the refactorings first.

Roman


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Firebird-net-provider mailing list
Firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider

Reply via email to