On 11/2/07, paha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Jiri Cincura wrote: > > > > Oh, now I understand. I was almost sleeping, so I was thinking wrong. > > So the main idea behind this is, "when I get error, let the row > > untouched (without AcceptChanges) so I'll be able to repeat the call > > to DB", right? > > > Bingo :)) . I don't know if SqlDataAdapter does so (still investigating, > can't try myself), and if there any standard handling of this situation, but > i think it is reasonable
Yes, it's reasonable. But wee need to check behavior of (de facto standard) SqlClient. > > Jiri Cincura wrote: > > > > The http://firebird.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/firebird/NETProvider/ > > is only proxy for web-viewing. > > > whatever, what i'm interested in - is there any possibility to get latest > snapshots with Svn Client :) ? https://firebird.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/firebird/NETProvider/trunk/NETProvider/source/FirebirdSql -- Jiri {x2} Cincura (Microsoft Student Partner) http://blog.vyvojar.cz/jirka/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Firebird-net-provider mailing list Firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider
