Hello: > So, I'm testing 5 cases per second and seems to be, that I'm little > bit confused with TransactionScope and no result. :) > I'm reading this today, sorry for the delay ... i'm a bit busy this times :) > To clarify things I'll do some summary. Focused on some basic ADO.NET > classes. If you're writing some objects, that will later bind to so > visual components you'll probably use FbXxx objects directly. > Ok. First thing we may solve is what to do when closing enlisted connections > The third and fourth case is IMO problem. Why??? IMO we have two > choices. When enlist is true and no TS block, throw exception (not my > favourite) OR just ignore the enlisting and do it without "thinking" > (my favourite). > There maybe a way to start an implicit transaction scope bu i don't know how ( it maybe too that SqlClient does different things when working against the DTV :P ) > I think there's a room for improvements. We should talk about this and > see what behaviour will fit most needs (something isn't possible > 'cause we don't have DTC). > Sure, and sorry for the delay again.
-- Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain Blog : http://carlosga.wordpress.com/ FirebirdClient : http://www.firebirdsql.org/ XMPP Client : http://code.google.com/p/xmppclient/ ohloh : http://www.ohloh.net/accounts/4138 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Firebird-net-provider mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider
