Jiri Cincura wrote: >> reader.HasRows()". About the breaking change, do you really think is >> anybody relying on a method that always return true? And if it was the > > Not always. From some time it returns true only for selects. But it > cannot be changed in a second, no matter how it's now, some people are > used to have this as it's now.
Is it possible to mark HasRows with "obsolete" attribute? Then people will get warnings when compiling code with newer versions of the provider... -- Oleg ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Firebird-net-provider mailing list Firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider
