Jiri, I don't think it will be a valid patch, I mean, it is good for us since we don't use some parts of the provider, but I'm sure it will break stuff.
I can send it to you because I think it will have to be published somehow (we can do it ourselves) in order to stick with the license, but I'm sure it won't make sense for most of you... :-( Jiri Cincura escribió: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:58 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I will do. How should I publish the results? I mean, maybe they're not >> interesting for you guys, but I think it's required due to licensing, right? >> > > You can send me patch. I'll review it, and commit to sources (if it's OK). > > >> :-) Don't tell me that!!! I'm a C# true believer, and I think we can >> achieve very good performance while sticking to .NET code... >> > > Me, too. :) > > >> I did, our tests still pass since we only use readers, and I got a >> > > Yes. But when we commit patch, everything else must be kept working. I > know, that some parts of code are not needed for some people, but it's > as is. > > >> performance improvement bigger than 50%!! >> > > And test it also on 20 items result set. Is the improvement still so > big? On 400k it can be, cause every ms counts. But on 20 it will be > maybe under measuring fault. :) Don't take me wrong. I'm happy with > any improvement, we just need to think about it. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Firebird-net-provider mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider
