Mon, 11 May 2009 14:24:16 +0300, Jiri Cincura <disk...@cincura.net>: > 2009/5/11 Ivan Arabadzhiev <intelru...@gmail.com>: >> public FbTransaction BeginTransaction(FbTransactionOptions options, >> string transactionName) >> >> overload of the function, but according to google fb 2.1 checks the >> header >> in a different way than fb 2.0. Is anyone else using this method (or am >> I >> a lot dummer than I think ...)? > > And what are you putting inside? > > The NUnit tests were running fine for 1.5, 2.0, 2.1 and 2.5 FB. >
well ... pretty much anything I could think of. From what I googled - I need a (Shared | LockRead | NoWait | RecordVersion) transaction. I have tried several variations (consistency, concurency, readcommited ...). It is intended to read through a table of ID`s that have changed since the last check, I do get the min and max id, so i don`t bother anyone adding info while I read. My last failure was with : public const FbTransactionOptions SyncTrans = FbTransactionOptions.Shared | FbTransactionOptions.LockRead | FbTransactionOptions.NoWait | FbTransactionOptions.Read | FbTransactionOptions.RecVersion | FbTransactionOptions.Consistency | FbTransactionOptions.NoAutoUndo; -- Ние лудите сме на изчезване, трябва да се подкрепяме ! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com _______________________________________________ Firebird-net-provider mailing list Firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider
