I don't know.
If I remember correctly I have read that unicode takes an extra byte
per character and I did not want to hit any technical limit (max.
lenghth of index key and such...)

And I dimly remember that there were such limits for FB 1.5, which
have been extended along with 2.x.

Our databases are still on FB 1.5 due to technical limitations of the
old programming tools. Only recently I converted another big part over
to C#/.net and will hopefully be done completely this summer.

ciao,
André

  
  
-- 


~~~Ihre Nachricht~~~

JC> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 16:54, André Knappstein, Controlling
JC> <knappst...@beta-eigenheim.de> wrote:
>> We changed everything to Win1252 instead, which supports spanish and
>> french characters as well as German Umlauts and ß

JC> Why not unicode?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
Firebird-net-provider mailing list
Firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider

Reply via email to