Hi, I`ve asked before (and yes, I remember the provider is not thread safe), but I recently started using the 3.5 framework and was hit by a lightning. Could the FirebirdConnection object get a public "ReaderWriterLockSlim" member? It would be just about one line of code (definition ...), and would be sort of a workarround for anyone like me, who can wrap connection operations in try/catche/finally blocks.
Actually, I am thinking about keeping up with the fb 2.5 client in aspects of thread safety (possibly concurrent transactions support), so I wanted to ask two things : 1 Is someone else working on the issue or is there a point for me to try it (I know it probably won`t be a one-night-job, but if no one else is working on the issue I figure a few weeks will not be a problem) 2 I have no actual experience in team development - what would be the proper way to try to implement that stuff (without getting in the way that is)? -- Sanity is a sin! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Firebird-net-provider mailing list Firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider
