On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 8:34 AM, Mercea Paul <paul.mer...@almexa.ro> wrote: > On 2011.08.13 5:42 PM, Jiri Cincura wrote: >> Hi *, >> >> I'd like to open discussion about versions of .NET Framework we're >> going to support in 3.0+ versions of .NET provider. >> >> 1. I'm strongly thinking about dropping support for .NET 2, because a) >> it's old, b) the .NET 3.5 doesn't change CLR, just bunch of new stuff, >> c) upgrade itself is free, d) it will save some resources on >> maintenance. >> >> 2. For the Compact Framework version, I have no idea what to do with >> it. Obviously the CF is dead on mainstream with Windows Phone, but >> there's still a lot of devices with WinCE (hard to predict what MS >> will do with this part of market). The current shift is to data feeds >> etc., but who knows, maybe somebody has good reasons to have direct >> calls. >> >> Any thoughts? >> > Hi Jiri > > I would keep support for .NET 2. Is still used by many users. > I don't know on Mono if all feature are ported but .NET 2 is fully > supported.
My guess if the current stable mono supports .net 3.5 (if you take a look at this table) http://www.mono-project.com/Compatibility Then i vote to go with .net 3.x support only ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FREE DOWNLOAD - uberSVN with Social Coding for Subversion. Subversion made easy with a complete admin console. Easy to use, easy to manage, easy to install, easy to extend. Get a Free download of the new open ALM Subversion platform now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Firebird-net-provider mailing list Firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider
