On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Jiri Cincura <disk...@cincura.net> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Sam Carleton > <scarle...@miltonstreet.com> wrote: >> My current thought is there is some way to associate the >> isc_info_sql_type and isc_info_sql_sub_type with the domain type. So, >> along these lines, what is the relationship between a domain type and >> the isc_info_sql_type and isc_info_sql_sub_type? > > It's not related to domain itself, but the underlying type.
Ok, so is the domain type only really useful during the design of the DB. I say that from the prospective of: It aids a DB Admin in designing the DB, but from the programming side of things it has no effect. Sam ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1 _______________________________________________ Firebird-net-provider mailing list Firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider
