04.07.2012 22:11, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote: > > Has this changed for the combination 2.1/2.5? AFAIK people successfully > did that with 2.0/2.1?
This is v2.5 specific. It was not intended, but it looks being unavoidable either. v2.5 names security classes in a way that prior versions don't accept. Dmitry
