Helen Borrie wrote:
>> I had thought that caching of write data in windows had been sorted, but I'm 
>> not
>> >entirely surprised if just some block of data has been lost.
> I believe the OP mentioned that they were using Fb 2.1.3.  That's almost 
> three years old now and two sub-releases out of date.  I suspect the moves to 
> improve the caching behaviour on Windows came more recently.
Actually I was referring to Windows itself rather than Firebird, but the 
improvements in FB were done because of this sort of problem.

>> >If it was one of my sites I'd drop a new machine in just to prove a point 
>> >...
> The system log reports of disk corruption are suspicious...but they don't 
> account for lost generator values. If the generator page was actually written 
> to a corrupt block, I'd expect the page to be kaput and to see other evidence 
> of corruption.  It seems more likely the page write was lost when they had 
> that power failure.
> I wonder whether anyone has checked to see whether Forced Writes is off.  If 
> so, the chances of pending writes disappearing on a power outage would be 
> high.
Again Windows seems to be a little too cleaver at times. While it may have 
reported a failed write, it still works as if the cached data has been written?
Even with Forced Writes on :(

-- 
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk


Reply via email to