> > > Okay, great! :) Unlike you, I don't speak from experience - I was > referring to Ann Harrison's comment in the mail I linked to: > > What this history means is that the engine is inherently > capable of handling concurrent transactions in a connection > but *there is no way to use them* [my emphasis, ML] and the > interface layers that surround the engine don't support the > capability. The requirement for multiple transactions per > connection came when a connection was very heavy-weight > relative to a transaction. I'm not convinced that's the > case now. > > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/firebird-support/message/118391 > > In this case I'm glad to be proved wrong by interface designers.
Cheers, Ann [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
