> --- In [email protected], "red_october2009" wrote: >> >> I came across this document: >> >> http://www.firebirdsql.org/file/documentation/papers_presentations/html/paper-fbent-impacting.html >> >> It seems to be talking about a much older version of FB than is available >> now. Even back in the days of Win 2003 Server, I've built systems that had >> probably 300 concurrent users without performance degradation. >> >> I intend to connect about 2000 concurrent users. Is the subject FB version >> capable on say, 16GB ram, assuming I have a very simple and efficient table >> structure, queries, plans, FKs and PKs? >> >> If FB cannot handle this number of concurrent connections, what DB should I >> move to? MS SQL or Oracle? or something else? >> > > Firebird can handle more than 100000 concurent users here is an example with > a production system http://www.firebirdnews.org/?p=6797
It depends what "concurrent" means. ;-) The article shows 719 real physical connections. -- With regards, Thomas Steinmaurer http://www.upscene.com/
