> On Oct 29, 2014, at 9:36 PM, Geoff Worboys ge...@telesiscomputing.com.au 
> [firebird-support] <firebird-support@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
> 
> Doesn't that depend on how they implemented the separate threads?
> SS does/can use different threads for separate connections to the
> same database, can't it?

Yes.

>  So if the threads operate over separate
> connections then wouldn't SS be able to use multiple CPUs?

The threading was designed for a single CPU machine so they don't make any 
effort to share data structures.  Multi-threaded, yes.  But only one thread can 
run at any one time.  That's what's great about V3 - threads running in 
parallel with a shared database page cache.

Cheers,

An
> 

  • [firebird-s... t...@camalot.ca [firebird-support]
    • Re: [f... Thomas Steinmaurer t...@iblogmanager.com [firebird-support]
    • Re: [f... Geoff Worboys ge...@telesiscomputing.com.au [firebird-support]
      • Re... Helen Borrie hele...@iinet.net.au [firebird-support]
        • ... Geoff Worboys ge...@telesiscomputing.com.au [firebird-support]
          • ... Helen Borrie hele...@iinet.net.au [firebird-support]
            • ... Geoff Worboys ge...@telesiscomputing.com.au [firebird-support]
              • ... 'Thomas Steinmaurer' t...@iblogmanager.com [firebird-support]
                • ... Geoff Worboys ge...@telesiscomputing.com.au [firebird-support]
          • ... Ann Harrison aharri...@ibphoenix.com [firebird-support]
    • Re: [f... Alexey Kovyazin a...@ib-aid.com [firebird-support]
      • [f... t...@camalot.ca [firebird-support]
    • [fireb... trsk...@yahoo.com [firebird-support]
      • RE... 'Louis van Alphen' lo...@nucleo.co.za [firebird-support]

Reply via email to