02.07.2015 19:36, 'Leyne, Sean' wrote: > >>> Oldest transaction 1 >>> Oldest active 2 >>> Oldest snapshot 2 >>> Next transaction 492 > > Even it that switch was used, why would the transactions appear to active?
They're not active, the header page is just out-of-date. Transaction counters are updated when some transaction is started. When nobody is connected, OAT does not make any sense. Dmitry
