> Hi, > > At August 28, 2015, 10:59 AM, Nick Upson [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>[firebird-support] wrote: > > > > > > > On 28 August 2015 at 14:43, Thomas Steinmaurer [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>[firebird-support] > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>http://www.firebirdsql.org/file/fb25_architecture_comparison.pdf > > IMHO, this one clearly states that there are 3 architectures in 2.5 > available. > > ​superserver & classic not applicable, embedded is sc, and sc itself => 1 > > > > I think that the line that is labeled "Architecture" should probably > read something else (i.e.: changes in architecture), or at the very > least repeat its header. But, all 3 architectures (superserver, classic > and superclassic) are available in FB 2.5, which superclassic is new to > 2.5. And, embedded was changed from superserver to superclassic > architecture.
Daniel and Nick, I agree, this is a bit confusing. ;-) The "architecture" line was for Embedded only, as the (three) columns for the server edition already is the equally named architecture. -- With regards, Thomas Steinmaurer http://www.upscene.com/ Professional Tools and Services for Firebird FB TraceManager, IB LogManager, Database Health Check, Tuning etc.
