hi,
could you explain this exception?And i also have not sql standard to look into 
and need some exact confirmation about this (something like Sql92 or sql2013.. 
say this)
regards,Karol Bieniaszewski

-------- Oryginalna wiadomość --------
Od: "Mark Rotteveel [email protected] [firebird-support]" 
<[email protected]> 
Data: 09.05.2016  13:20  (GMT+01:00) 
Do: [email protected] 
Temat: Re: [firebird-support] SQL standard for sort fields and returned fields 


 



  


    
      
      
      On 2016-05-09 11:45, liviuslivius [email protected] 

[firebird-support] wrote:

> Hi,

>

> This is not specific to Firebird question but:

> is something in SQL standard specification about sorted fields must 

> be

> also returned?

> I mean:

>

> SELECT

> [FILM_DATE,]FILM_TITLE

> FROM

> FILMS

> ORDER BY FILM_DATE, FILM_TITLE

>

> is [FILM_DATE] required by SQL standard or it is optional or SQL

> standard tell nothing about this?



I don't have the SQL standard at hand right now, so I can't double 

check. As far as I know, the SQL standard allows you to sort on any 

field, even if it is not in the select list (with the exception of 

course of ordering by column index).



Mark



    
     

    
    


Reply via email to