I'm jumping in late on this one, but I'm wondering if you could implement a single database that all users share but they are restricted to seeing only their own data. I know it isn't the question you asked, but I believe that many rows are more easily handled than many databases.
I'm glad you got your problem fixed, but I fear it is only a matter of time before this issue pops up again. Good luck! Louis Kleiman On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 7:34 PM Tony Christiansen t...@adegroup.com.au [firebird-support] <firebird-support@yahoogroups.com> wrote: > Thank you for spelling that out - my deductive powers are weak. ;( > > Best regards > > On 6/05/2020 8:04 pm, Dimitry Sibiryakov s...@ibphoenix.com > [firebird-support] wrote: > > 06.05.2020 12:01, Tony Christiansen t...@adegroup.com.au > [firebird-support] wrote: > >> It just shows > >> > >> Firebird SQL Server (32 bit) > >> - Firebird Server - DefaultInstance > >> > >> No mention of the mode that I can see. > > You should also read documentation about differences between the > modes. Classic server > > runs process per attachment. > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------ > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > Visit http://www.firebirdsql.org and click the Documentation item > on the main (top) menu. Try FAQ and other links from the left-side menu > there. > > Also search the knowledgebases at > http://www.ibphoenix.com/resources/documents/ > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo Groups Links > > > >
