On Sep 3, 12:48 pm, weyus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I see this "new" (?) functionality that requires two POSTs to show
> the response for a POST request.
What is new is that you can see the POST response.
>
> I see unhelpful things when I do this, which I don't feel it necessary
> to go into now.
Right, we know its not good.
>
> I've read a very long thread that goes into all this detail about
> pulling responses from cache and what have you.
>
> I have very basic questions around this:
>
> 1) Why is a double POST required in the first place, at the most basic
> level?
To show you the response to a POST. We have no other way to obtain
the response.
>
> 2) What is all this talk about retrieving the POST response from
> cache? That doesn't even make sense to me.
That question is difficult to answer, perhaps you can re-phrase it?
If you did not expect POST responses to be cached, consider
http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec9.html part 9.5
>
> If you can point me to a relevant online resource, I'm happy to do
> some reading.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430155
http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/list?q=label:doubleLoad
>
> Thanks,
> Wes
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Firebug" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
