Sounds good. We can coordinate later today if you like. Not quite sure how we're going to handle a beta on 1.2.1 but I guess that's a detail we can work out later.
On Sep 7, 12:38 am, John J Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, I'm thinking 1.2.1 makes sense. Maybe we can do a beta next week > and see how it goes. > > On Sep 6, 5:36 pm, "Mike Shaver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Can we backport the UA CSS fix (or even just disabling without pref) > > on the 1.2 stream soon? Seems like it's pure footgun for users. :( > > > Mike > > > On 9/5/08, John J Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The four features we have implemented so far in 1.3 are > > > 1) viewport source box for Script panel (faster for large JS). > > > 2) trace console (for debugging Firebug) > > > 3) support for nsITraceableChannel (you need nightly builds for > > > Firefox 3.1 or 3.0.3 to use it) > > > 4) showUserAgentCSS option. > > > Bugs fixed are listed in the release notes. > > >http://code.google.com/p/fbug/source/browse/branches/firebug1.3/docs/... > > > > Be warned that 1.3a1 will update to 1.3a2 etc. and that the "a" stands > > > for "Alpha" as in "yeah it did not crash, ship it". > > > > jjb > > > -- > > Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
