On Nov 19, 6:21 pm, Manoj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So now I know why y'all thought developing the UI would be a
> challenge. :-) This will certainly take more time than I had
> initially anticipated. There are a couple of other crinkles I will
> have to think about:
>
> 1. The frame for the FUNCTION_CALL callback does not include the
> current function being called. So I will have to use the
> FUNCTION_RETURN callback to complete the picture. This can present
> some challenge in keeping an accurate timeline w.r.t the XHR requests
> that happened in this function.
? I don't know what callbacks you are using here.
If you use jsdICallHook you get the stack frame on call and return.
>
> 2. The event listener will have to be registered on every DOM node. It
> will have to be re-registered incase the tree is dynamically altered.
> Still, AFAIK there is no guarantee that my event listener will get
> triggered *before* those of the web application itself. Again, this
> will present a problem from tracking these events from a timeline
> perspective.
You might take a look at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=448602
With this you get some better information.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Firebug" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
