It may have been deliberate to 'duck type' or allow Array-like
objects.  An instanceof test would be the only accurate test, but it
may (or may not) be helpful to handle user-created objects as Arrays,
or other things like NodeList, which seems to have its own special
handling.

-Adam

On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Brian Di Palma <[email protected]> wrote:
> Which explains why the Object is not being taken as an Array.
>
> typeof obj.splice === 'function'
>
> that condition is failing. Correctly too an object is not an Array.
>
> On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 4:54 PM, John J Barton <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, I was just trying to summarize. The actual test is:
>> if (isFinite(obj.length) && typeof obj.splice === 'function')
>>
>> jjb
>>
>> On Jan 3, 8:22 am, "Brian Di Palma" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > That's not an Array it's an object. For a native Array length is
>> > controlled
>> > for you and splice() is provided to you.
>> >
>> > [] === Array
>> >
>> > {} === Object
>> >
>> > On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 7:03 AM, Garrett Smith
>> > <[email protected]>wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 9:28 PM, John J Barton
>> > > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > > Any Javascript object with 'length' and 'splice' should format as an
>> > > > array. If not please report a bug.
>> >
>> > > Using Firebug 1.2.1, an object with properties |length| and |splice|
>> > > is not formatted the same as an Array.
>> > > Example:
>> > > >>> ({splice:1, length:2, '0':0, '1':1, '2':2})
>> > > Object splice=1 length=2
>> > > >>> [0,1,2]
>> > > 0,1,2
>> >
>> > > Please describe how an array is to be formatted so that a bug can be
>> > > filed.
>> >
>> > > Thanks,
>> >
>> > > Garrett
>> >
>> > > > jjb
>> >
>> > > > On Jan 2, 11:09 am, Danny <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > >> Thanks; that makes sense. But Firebug also changed the way it
>> > > >> displays
>> > > >> true arrays. Arrays of simple types like [1,2,3] are listed; arrays
>> > > >> that contain objects are displayed as "Object". console.dir()
>> > > >> helps,
>> > > >> but it was nice to have it all in one line.
>> >
>> > > >> Danny
>> >
>> > > >> On Jan 2, 12:46 pm, John J Barton <[email protected]>
>> > > >> wrote:
>> >
>> > > >> > jQuery('div') is not an array. It has length but not splice. So
>> > > >> > Firebug does not format it as an array.
>> >
>> > > >> > In Javascript, the line between what is an array and what is not
>> > > >> > an
>> > > >> > array is unclear.  After many versions the current test in
>> > > >> > Firebug
>> > > >> > requires an array to have 'length' and 'splice'. Earlier versions
>> > > >> > of
>> > > >> > Firebug only required 'length', but that caused some objects to
>> > > >> > be
>> > > >> > formatted as arrays that did not have numerical indexes.
>> >
>> > > >> > jjb
>> >
>> > > >> > On Jan 1, 10:10 pm, Danny <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > >> > > Has anyone else using jQuery noticed that Firebug before 1.2
>> > > >> > > would
>> > > >> > > treat console.log(jQuery('div')) as an array and list all the
>> > > matched
>> > > >> > > elements on the console, so you could mouse over the list and
>> > > >> > > highlight the elements, or right-click and scroll into view
>> > > >> > > etc.,
>> > > but
>> > > >> > > now it just lists "Object length=13" and you need to click on
>> > > >> > > that,
>> > > >> > > then you get a vertical list that you need to scroll through.
>> > > >> > > The
>> > > old
>> > > >> > > way was more helpful, I think.
>> >
>> > > >> > > Workaround: console.log.apply(console, jQuery('div').get())
>> > > >> > > comes
>> > > >> > > close to reproducing the old behavior.
>> >
>> > > >> > > I'll crosspost this on the jQuery list.
>>
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Firebug" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to