I was aware the source was not altered - hence the request for an API or something to get the edited stuff back to the 'project'.source. I can see the edited code there on the screen and if I can cut and paste it into the source then it shouldnt be too hard to automate that*. I'll have a look at firediff and see where thats going. Tom *now where have I heard that before?
On May 8, 4:44 pm, johnjbarton <[email protected]> wrote: > One thing I think you may be missing: Firebug does not edit source. It > edits the live objects in Firefox. The source is not altered. > > Kevin Decker's firediff is a first step to allow Firebug edits to be > reconciled back into source. At first it will allow manual edit > transfers but later I expect semi-automatic updates, along the lines > of what revision control systems provide (usually works, fall back to > manual). > > jjb > > On May 8, 4:26 am, Tom Potts <[email protected]> wrote: > > > From what I can see of Firebug it does just about everything one wants > > from an IDE except save and update the 'project'. > > Are there any plans for an API that we can write backends for to allow > > the logical extension of firebug into an IDE? > > Or am I just sooo out of touch its already there somewhere? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
