Thanks for your reply. I am aware of that obfuscator tool. But for one thing, knowing that tool doesn't necessarily provide much useful information about reverse engineering an obfuscated code. For the other, the code I'm dealing with is obfuscated in a completely different way, and seems much more sophisticated.
Canny On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Kara Rawson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yan Huang wrote: > > In my case, I am reverse engineering obfuscated JS code written by > > others. So it's equivalently hard to > > find the place to insert "debugger". > > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Hernan Rodriguez Colmeiro > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 12:12, Yan Huang<[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > Hi Guys, > > > With some play-around, I tend to try developing a new feature > > that allows > > > the JS interpreter to pause at any function whose string name is > > specified > > > by the user. It seems that the feature is not available in the > > present > > > stable version of Firebug. Would you please give me some advice > > and pointers > > > how to accomplish this mini-project? > > > > Just a suggestion, but did you try using the "debugger" keyword > > wherever you want to pause? > > > > Hernán > > > > > > > > > > > > this might be helpful todecode some of that obfuscated code > > http://dean.edwards.name/packer/ > > kara > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
