On Aug 17, 10:04 pm, sir_brizz <[email protected]> wrote: [snip] > blacklisting sites, which will bring it much closer to the 1.2 > functionality (which I, personally, view as the optimal model for > future versions of Firebug partially because I see it as the most user- > friendly and usable version of Firebug). > Agree. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
- Re: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? sir_brizz
- Re: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? johnjbarton
- Re: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? sir_brizz
- Re: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? johnjbarton
- Re: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? goodtest
- Re: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? johnjbarton
- Re: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? sir_brizz
- Re: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? sir_brizz
- Re: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? johnjbarton
- Re: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? sir_brizz
- Re: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? dan_m2k
- Re: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? Scott Shumaker
- Re: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? johnjbarton
- Re: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? Scott Shumaker
- Re: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? nroussi
- RE: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? Trevan Richins
- Re: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? johnjbarton
- Re: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? ebusyness
- Re: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? goodtest
- Re: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? johnjbarton
- Re: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? goodtest
