On Dec 7, 7:30 pm, Hernan Rodriguez Colmeiro <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 14:09, johnjbarton <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Sep 11, 9:28 am, Nick Fitzsimons <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 2009/9/11 Nick Fitzsimons <[email protected]>: > > >> > 2009/9/11 John J Barton <[email protected]>: > > >> > Finally, the document fragment is inserted before the > >> > referenceElement, which must therefore be a child of element. > > >> One more point: if referenceElement is not passed to the function, > >> then insertBefore will act to append the document fragment to the end > >> of element's existing content, which may be where the "append" part of > >> the name comes from. > > > Thanks a lot for this info. One more question: is the fragment a valid > > input for 'referenceElement'? I take the return value as the inserted > > element and later put it in as the referenceElement (in the case where > > we want to prepend). > > As stated inhttps://developer.mozilla.org/en/dom/documentfragment, > the fragment extends Node, so it should be a valid referenceElement. > What I don't get is what you mean as "return value", because I don't > see a return in the method.
I added one after my first post: http://code.google.com/p/fbug/source/browse/branches/firebug1.5/content/firebug/lib.js#975 > > Hernan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
