> Sorry I can't follow the paragraph below this one. For this test, did > you see the same leak as before? None?
Not the same leak it was more like a lite version of the memory leak. Maybe there are more leaks in different modules. This there be an explanation why in this test case the leak is just so low an i needed the double time to see that is a memory leak. But this is just a speculation. > ? The pointer to? Anyway the result was? With pointer I mean that the panel was selected. The result was that there was a little more memory usage after a few hundred reloads with any panel selected. > > The memory usage was pending in an area of ~20-40 MB at reloadings. > > Is that good or bad? I don't think it's bad. I made a realod every ~2 seconds and firefox seems to be cache every time the site again in the memory. After a few reloads the memory is decreasing a little (~20-40 MB). I think this is just a garbage collection of firefox.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
