On Feb 23, 1:07 am, woomla <[email protected]> wrote: > Wow, quick action. > > Appearently it looks like its from an internal team note. Now it's in > the open, I suggest to change 'you' in 'Started' into 'we'. Some > comments are clearly for developers. You might want to remove them or > rewrite them so we, the poor users, now that it is not intended for > us, i.e. add tags ... in Triaged.
Please edit the wiki to make these corrections. jjb > > Anyways, I'm amazed about how fast you react on these things. > > Cheers. > > On 22 feb, 17:32, John J Barton <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Feb 22, 1:37 am, woomla <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I was hoping to find some documentation about the issue statuses. And > > > in particular the actions the firebug team will take on them and what > > > is they expected from the op. > > > > I.e. If the status of my issus is fixed or commit or verified, what > > > actions do you want from me. > > > And if the status is Triaged, what will you do with that issue. > > > > I think you guys (no gals?) do a hell of a great job here. So I'm not > > > looking for some legal commitment or something stupid like that. All I > > > want to know is what could be expected from you. And off course from > > > me so I can participate more meaningful. > > > > Maybe a nice wiki page? > > > I copied Mike's excellent post > > intohttp://getfirebug.com/wiki/index.php/FAQ#What_do_the_issue_status_fie... > > > jjb > > > > Woomla -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
