On Sep 7, 9:15 pm, runrunforest <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Pedro, > > I see nothing wrong with my question or attitude, you just took it > dramatically. Did I attack or mock anything? No.
I think "more than useless" is an attack. > > Does firebug lite do what it does in FF ? No. so firebug lite useless > in my opinion. 199,000 users disagree with your opinion. > > I ask question, No full firebug for chrome because of developers have > no time ? True, based on your answer. Your question does not make any sense. There is no such thing as 'full firebug'. There are specific versions of firebug for specific versions of browsers. If there is a specific feature missing from Firebug Lite for chrome that you want to discuss, then let's hear about that. > > Or because technical limitation ? Which's also true. Again not a sensible question because the technical limitations depend upon the feature. > > Am I not contributing? wrong, Im trying to address what halt > development for firebug chrome. Whoever comes by this post would > probably have the answer for their question, why firebug lite suck ? A 'contribution' of insulting the developers is not welcome here. > So they stop complaining somewhere else and probably start helping new > development as well. But you are doing the complaining. jjb -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
