Actually there is already an issue for this: 
http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/detail?id=791
Though comment 3 of this issue is still waiting for further
discussion...
What shall we do with issue 3505?

On Oct 4, 9:00 pm, "Jan Odvarko" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yep, make sense to me, please report a new issue so, it isn't forgotten here
> in the noise.
>
> http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/list?start=0
>
> Thanks!
> Honza
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> > Of ed
> > Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 8:54 PM
> > To: Firebug
> > Subject: Re: colors
>
> > You're correct. I hadn't touched my theme, but this a work notebook
> > that came to me with a corporate defined theme. I switched to "windows
> > classic" and can read the html panel now.  I'm with Pedro, though if
> > firebug is going to participate in windows themes, it needs to use
> > theme colors for foreground and background colors to avoid contrast
> > issues.
>
> > On Oct 4, 1:49 pm, Pedro Simonetti Garcia <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > Hi Ed and Honza,
>
> > > The "highlight" color is defined as a "system color", so it will
> > > depend on the color settings of the OS. I guess Ed is using a
> > > different color theme than the default, or classic.
>
> > > Anyway, in my opinion we should avoid using system colors because we
> > > can't predict what colors will be used, and therefore, we can't
> > > prevent color-contrast problems such as this one reported by Ed.
>
> > > regards,
>
> > > Pedro Simonetti.
>
> > > 2010/10/4 Honza (Jan Odvarko) <[email protected]>:
>
> > > >> I should have included that I'm running windows xp professional sp3
> > > > I am also running WinXP (on other machine), but my screen looks
> > > > different comparing to your screenshot. What Firefox theme do you use?
> > > > Or could it be a custom OS theme that could cause the difference?
>
> > > > Honza
>
> > > > On Oct 4, 7:19 pm, ed <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> I should have included that I'm running windows xp professional sp3
>
> > > >> On Oct 4, 1:14 pm, Ed Schiebel <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > >> > I see this problem with both 1.5.4 and 1.6b1 running in firefox
> > 3.6.10
> > > >> > (though it's been this way for a long time). I've attached 3
> > images.
> > > >> > normal_div shows a normal, visible div highlighted in the HTML tab
> > > >> > hidden_div shows a div with style="display:none" highlighted in the
> > HTML tab
> > > >> > orphan_div shows a div created via document.createElement("div"),
> > but not
> > > >> > added to the document yet. To get this, I used the console to show
> > me
> > > >> > orphan_div, then clicked on the link.
>
> > > >> > as you can see, in the last 2, the HTML is unreadable.
> > > >> > --ed
>
> > > >> > >   Topic:
> > colors<http://groups.google.com/group/firebug/t/9a5f273c3710be36>
>
> > > >> > >    Jan Odvarko <[email protected]> Oct 04 01:54PM +0200
> > ^<#12b781ebb1f38450_digest_top>
>
> > > >> > >    What Firebug version do you use?
>
> > > >> > >    I have tried that with Firebug 1.6 and selected HTML nodes (in
> > the HTML
> > > >> > >    panel) are always using blue background with white text,
> > doesn't matter
> > > >> > >    if
> > > >> > >    the selected node is currently visible or not.
>
> > > >> > >    http://getfirebug.com/releases/firebug/1.6X/firebug-
> > 1.6X.0b1.xpi
>
> > > >> > >    I am attaching a screenshot.
>
> > > >> > >    But perhaps, I don't understand the problem well?
>
> > > >> > >    Honza
>
> > > >> > >   Topic: New Feature Request: Saving
> > Profiles<http://groups.google.com/group/firebug/t/b069070d680c6163>
>
> > > >> > >    "Honza (Jan Odvarko)" <[email protected]> Oct 04 04:47AM -0700
> > ^<#12b781ebb1f38450_digest_top>
>
> > > >> > >    Seehttps://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/2108/
>
> > > >> > >    Honza
>
> > > >> > >   Topic: about memory
> > breakpoint<http://groups.google.com/group/firebug/t/9d187c503bb7ee36>
>
> > > >> > >    aj3423 <[email protected]> Oct 04 06:13PM +0800
> > ^<#12b781ebb1f38450_digest_top>
>
> > > >> > >    in some debugger like ollydbg, user can set a break point to a
> > memory
> > > >> > >    address, when there is a read/write access to that memory
> > address, the
> > > >> > >    debugger will break. I think it is very useful in javascript
> > debugging.
> > > >> > >    Sometime my variable value is changed and I couldn't found
> > where it is
> > > >> > >    modified. It'll be great if I can set a variable break point
> > to
> > > >> > >    variables
> > > >> > >    like a.b.c, then it breaks when the code does a.b.c = 123,
> > > >> > >    Is it possible for the enhancement? Will firebug add the new
> > 'variable
> > > >> > >    break
> > > >> > >    point' in the future version?
>
> > > >> > >    Thanks.
>
> > > >> > >    "Honza (Jan Odvarko)" <[email protected]> Oct 04 04:41AM -0700
> > ^<#12b781ebb1f38450_digest_top>
>
> > > >> > >    There is already partial support for this within the DOM
> > panel.
>
> > > >> > >    For example, if you have an object a = {prop1: 1, prop2: 2}
> > you can
> > > >> > >    create a breakpoint for its properties.
>
> > > >> > >    1) Select the DOM panel
> > > >> > >    2) Expand the object |a|
> > > >> > >    3) Create a breakpoint for |prop1| by clicking on the
> > breakpoint
> > > >> > >    column.
> > > >> > >    4) Change the value -> Firebug's debugger should break and
> > switch to
> > > >> > >    the Script panel showing the source line that caused the
> > break;
>
> > > >> > >    See more here:
> > > >> > >    http://getfirebug.com/doc/breakpoints/demo.html#dom
>
> > > >> > >    Honza
>
> > > >> > >   Topic: Firebug : How to make net tab
> > persistent?<http://groups.google.com/group/firebug/t/f6a170f73054ba71>
>
> > > >> > >    "Honza (Jan Odvarko)" <[email protected]> Oct 04 04:37AM -0700
> > ^<#12b781ebb1f38450_digest_top>
>
> > > >> > >    > Off line Honza and I agreed to just let the Persist be
> > manual: you
> > > >> > >    > will accumulate net traffic until you press it off.
> > > >> > >    Will be in Firebug 1.7a3
> > > >> > >    Honza
>
> > > >> > >  --
> > > >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> > Google Groups
> > > >> > > "Firebug" group.
> > > >> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > >> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>
> > [email protected]<firebug%[email protected]
> > m >
> > > >> > > .
> > > >> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > >> > >http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
>
> > > >> >  normal_div.jpg
> > > >> > 53KViewDownload
>
> > > >> >  hidden_div.jpg
> > > >> > 52KViewDownload
>
> > > >> >  orphan_div.jpg
> > > >> > 55KViewDownload
>
> > > > --
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "Firebug" group.
> > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected].
> > > > For more options, visit this group
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Firebug" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Firebug" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.

Reply via email to