On Oct 8, 4:14 am, mikewse <mike...@gmail.com> wrote: > Should I add this as a bug ticket even though I can't provide a test > environment, or should we continue to discuss the bug here?
You can try to debug the problem yourself by using Firebug's tracing. http://getfirebug.com/wiki/index.php/FAQ#Using_the_Tracing_Version_of_Firebug The first place I would look is in tabCache and sourceCache with CACHE tracing. jjb > > Best regards > Mike > > On Oct 7, 6:24 pm, mikewse <mike...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Oct 7, 4:26 pm, "Honza (Jan Odvarko)" <odva...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Could this be related to the following > > > issuehttp://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/detail?id=2434 > > > I have no knowledge about if the code paths are shared for redirects > > and authentication requests so I couldn't say. On the surface they > > look different as Firebug shows the individual redirect requests, but > > hides the authentication requests once they are replaced by the next > > request in the authentication sequence. > > > I think I am seeing another pattern in my original example; scripts > > served with a Content-Length don't exhibit the problem while ones > > using chunked encoding does. Does that make sense? > > > It would be preferrable to solve this at the network level, but if not > > possible, could the Script tab fetch its script source from a > > mechanism similar to Firefox's View Source? (which does work correctly) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
