As far as the Cuzillion example is concerned, the first 6 images
shouldn't block at all (if max connections is set to 6) so it doesn't
look to me that the DNS resolution is displayed instead of the
blocking time.


I tried the Cuzillion example again and got following results:
http://www.softwareishard.com/har/viewer/?inputUrl=http://www.softwareishard.com/temp/har/stevesouders.com.harp

It's different there is not DNS resolution (it's already in my cache),
but it's visible that the connection took some time to create first 6
connections (for the first 6 requests). And the last two requests
reused an existing connection.

I tried also the http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/ example.
http://www.softwareishard.com/har/viewer/?inputUrl=http://www.softwareishard.com/temp/har/www.thestudentroom.co.uk.harp

But it's too complex to say there is a bug.

Anyway, not sure how to properly test/debug the DNS connection time.
Do you have any solid examples that have predicted behavior?

Honza


On Nov 18, 10:22 pm, Adrian Yee <[email protected]> wrote:
> Any input on this one Honza?  Thanks!
>
> Adrian
>
> On 10/29/10 12:40, Adrian Yee wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I'm running into an issue with the Firebugnetpanelgiving what seems
> > to beincorrecttimings. What seems to be happening is that places where
> > it seems that it's blocking, it's showing it as DNS requests. It's best
> > shown in an example:
>
> >http://gtmetrix.com/reports/www.thestudentroom.co.uk/x6PUgJMn/harview...
>
> > All the requests to static.thestudentroom.co.uk look like they're
> > blocking from the connection limit, but they show up as DNS lookups.
>
> > However, blocking connections do work, for example, using cuzillion:
>
> >http://gtmetrix.com/reports/stevesouders.com/qJFG9jpO/harviewer?url=h...
>
> > correctly shows the last 2 connections as blocking, but then the DNS
> > lookup time looks a little high. Even if we retest (where the DNS
> > request should be cached), it still shows a 544ms time for the DNS lookup.
>
> > GTmetrix currently uses:
>
> > Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.2.10)
> > Gecko/20100914 Firefox/3.6.10
> > Firebug 1.5.4
> > NetExport 0.8b8
>
> > Though I have also tested on:
>
> > Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12)
> > Gecko/20101026 Firefox/3.6.12
> > Firebug 1.5.4
>
> > Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100920
> > Gentoo Firefox/3.6.9
> > Firebug 1.7X.0a4
>
> > Adrian
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Firebug" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.

Reply via email to