On Apr 30, 1:23 am, pd <[email protected]> wrote: > The 'abstract' in the Abstract worries me if it is really meant to > mean 'obfuscate'.
I'm sorry I do not understand this sentence. > > Whilst being able to use my debugging client of choice with any > browser acting as the 'server', there's limited value if this protocol > obfuscates though standardization the variations of the various > browsers. On the contrary, our intent is to highlight different features of different browsers. We plan to implement client side features for the best server side features and advise users when the browser they happen to use does not support a feature they try. > > Good luck getting a certain vendor to cooperate :) We welcome and encourage vendor cooperation, but we don't plan on waiting for it. The only case I feel a bit bad about is Opera where they created a remote debug system but we don't plan to use their protocol. jjb > > On Apr 29, 7:48 am, John J Barton <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Preprint of a paper on Crossfire is > > available:http://blog.getfirebug.com/2011/04/28/crossfire-multiprocess-cross-br... > > > jjb -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
