On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 4:50 PM, pedz <[email protected]> wrote: > I wonder if "re-architecting" firebug is wise (and I don't know exactly what > is in progress). Sometimes starting fresh is very nice.
Right now there is Firebug for Firefox, and Firefox Lite for Chrome, IE, Opera et al. The rearchitecture is intended to allow more of the core code to be available across browsers. Right now, much of Firebug itself is inherently tied to Firefox, and not portable elsewhere. I'd call a rewrite for portability and extensibility *very* wise. I'd like to be able to use Firebug in any browser, and have it look and act substantially the same, with the same feature set available. As browsers develop and improve, and add support for more emerging web standards like HTML5, CSS3, and more recent additions to JavaScript, this becomes more possible, if you have a portable and flexible code base on which to build. _____ Dennis -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
