On Oct 9, 7:14 pm, dtr <[email protected]> wrote:
> I hope that my test case helps to reproduce and understand my problem.
I am not able to see the problem using the test case provided.
(tested with a fresh new profile: Firefox 7 + Firebug 1.8.3)

> I'm now wondering if I need to open a bug or should rather wait for
> feedback in this forum?
So, far we can't reproduce the problem so, not able to fix it.
As soon as we have a solid test case that helps us to see the problem,
then yes, please report a bug.

Thanks!
Honza

> Thank you,
> Dieter
>
> On Oct 7, 4:29 pm, Jan Honza Odvarko <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Firebug is using JSD to intercept load of every script on the page.
>
> > If "no javascript on this page" is displayed, it means that Firebug's
> > hook wasn't executed at all ie no script has been loaded on the page.
>
> > (or there is a bug in the hook)
>
> > Honza
>
> > On Oct 7, 4:24 pm, dtr <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > I for sure will try to create a test case but I do not yet understand
> > > what goes wrong.
> > > Could you please help me to better understand what the message means.
>
> > > Thank you
> > > -Dieter
>
> > > On Oct 7, 4:06 pm, Jan Honza Odvarko <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > 3) Any chance I could try your page on my machine?
> > > > > unfortunately not (server side in a lan)
>
> > > > Could you please make simplified test case and attach it to a bug
> > > > report?
> > > > As soon as I can reproduce the problem, I can fix it.
>
> > > > Honza
>
> > > > On Oct 7, 3:59 pm, dtr <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > 1) Sometimes if there is a script error on the page the entire 
> > > > > > script
> > > > > > compilation could fail and Firebug doesn't see the script.
>
> > > > > at least the ff error console does not show any script errors and the
> > > > > same page can be debugged using the build-in chrome js debugger
>
> > > > > > 2) Does it work with Firebug 1.9a3?
> > > > > >http://getfirebug.com/releases/firebug/1.9/
>
> > > > > nothing changed after the upgrade
>
> > > > > > 3) Any chance I could try your page on my machine?
>
> > > > > unfortunately not (server side in a lan)
>
> > > > > > 4) Do you see any scripts when loading e.g.www.google.com?
>
> > > > > yes
>
> > > > > thank you
> > > > > -dieter
>
> > > > > On Oct 7, 1:44 pm, Jan Honza Odvarko <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Some options:
>
> > > > > > 1) Sometimes if there is a script error on the page the entire 
> > > > > > script
> > > > > > compilation could fail and Firebug doesn't see the script.
>
> > > > > > 2) Does it work with Firebug 
> > > > > > 1.9a3?http://getfirebug.com/releases/firebug/1.9/
>
> > > > > > 3) Any chance I could try your page on my machine?
>
> > > > > > 4) Do you see any scripts when loading e.g.www.google.com?
>
> > > > > > Honza
>
> > > > > > On Oct 7, 1:25 pm, dtr <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > when trying to debug js in a jquery based page i get the following
> > > > > > > message: "No Javascript on this page If <script> tags have a 
> > > > > > > "type"
> > > > > > > attribute it should equal "text/javascript" or "application/
> > > > > > > javascript".
> > > > > > > this seems to have worked in the past.
> > > > > > > using ff 7.0.1 and firebug 1.8.3.
> > > > > > > i guess this is because of templates using the script tag but 
> > > > > > > have no
> > > > > > > idea on what to do.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Firebug" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.

Reply via email to