Sounds good, except for the 'longterm' bit :) Mozilla should give you some of the resources it's spending on native tools to get this done. That way it's a more fair competition: instead of native tools attracting all the new casual developers (like it did this week, four of them!), Firebug would have a better chance of attracting casual devs if they could just clone a git repo and make changes much easier.
On Dec 7, 6:17 pm, Jan Honza Odvarko <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wednesday, December 7, 2011 8:12:59 AM UTC+1, pd wrote: > > > Honza have you considered opening the Firebug codebase to git? > > > On Nov 29, 6:49 pm, Kikimor <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Subj. > > > I create patch and I wont to send it to developers. How can I do this? > > Yes, it's actually our long term plan. > Honza -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/firebug
