Thanks, yes, the performance is hugely better, by at least 2 orders of magnitude. Thanks so much for the pointer, and for your work on this. Cheers, Antranig.
On Mar 16, 2:58 pm, Jan Honza Odvarko <[email protected]> wrote: > Please try Firebug > 1.10a5http://getfirebug.com/releases/firebug/1.10/firebug-1.10.0a5.xpi > > (it's an alpha, but pretty stable) > > ...and let us know whether is better. > > Hozna > > > > > > > > On Friday, March 16, 2012 9:54:22 PM UTC+1, AntranigBasman wrote: > > > For the last several version of Firefox, I've noticed extremely bad > > performance when sending logging messages to an open console in > > Firebug using console.log(). I didn't notice exactly when they began, > > but it could have been around the Firefox 8 or 9 era. Upgrading this > > week to the lastest Firefox 11 and Firebug 1.9.1 doesn't improve the > > issue, and neither does installing Firebug on an empty profile. > > > As an idea of the scale of the problems, a page which loads in a few > > hundred ms with no logging, takes 5 seconds with about 80 logging > > messages, and 30 seconds with a few hundred. This is sort of back in > > the realms of performance of the IE8/9 console logger - and Chrome can > > show both sets of logs in well under 1 second. > > > Has there been some huge regression in logging performance some time > > within the last few months? > > > As mentioned above, I am using FF11 and FB 1.9.1, this is a Windows 7 > > machine with AMD 64, but colleagues have reported similar problems on > > MacOS as well. > > > Thanks for any help, > > Antranig. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/firebug
