Firebug 1.10 is backward compatible in most parts. I.e. it doesn't require extensions to be AMD/bootstrapped. Though we recommend moving to AMD when you want to rework your code anyway.
Sebastian On Tuesday, July 17, 2012 11:18:17 PM UTC+2, Joshua Strauss wrote: > > Hello All, > > I'm wondering if as an extension developer, will firebug 1.10 require it's > extensions to be AMD/Bootstrapped? > > I'm in the process of reworking my code it account for this, but I would > appreciate knowing if this is a requirement for 1.10? > > Thank You, > Joshua > On Tuesday, July 17, 2012 11:18:17 PM UTC+2, Joshua Strauss wrote: > > Hello All, > > I'm wondering if as an extension developer, will firebug 1.10 require it's > extensions to be AMD/Bootstrapped? > > I'm in the process of reworking my code it account for this, but I would > appreciate knowing if this is a requirement for 1.10? > > Thank You, > Joshua > On Tuesday, July 17, 2012 11:18:17 PM UTC+2, Joshua Strauss wrote: > > Hello All, > > I'm wondering if as an extension developer, will firebug 1.10 require it's > extensions to be AMD/Bootstrapped? > > I'm in the process of reworking my code it account for this, but I would > appreciate knowing if this is a requirement for 1.10? > > Thank You, > Joshua > On Tuesday, July 17, 2012 11:18:17 PM UTC+2, Joshua Strauss wrote: > > Hello All, > > I'm wondering if as an extension developer, will firebug 1.10 require it's > extensions to be AMD/Bootstrapped? > > I'm in the process of reworking my code it account for this, but I would > appreciate knowing if this is a requirement for 1.10? > > Thank You, > Joshua > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/firebug
